On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 at 17:01, Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 03:27:34PM -0400, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > Stateful vhost devices may need to free resources or clear device state upon > > device reset. The vhost-user protocol has a VHOST_USER_RESET_DEVICE message > > for > > this and vDPA has SET_STATUS 0, but only QEMU's vhost-user-scsi device > > actually > > implements this today. > > > > This patch series performs device reset across all device types. When > > virtio_reset() is called, the associated vhost_dev's ->vhost_reset_device() > > is > > called. vhost-user-scsi's one-off implementation is obsoleted and removed. > > > > This patch affects behavior as follows: > > - vhost-kernel: no change in behavior. No ioctl calls are made. > > - vhost-user: back-ends that negotiate > > VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_RESET_DEVICE now receive a > > VHOST_USER_DEVICE_RESET message upon device reset. Otherwise there is > > no change in behavior. DPDK, SPDK, libvhost-user, and the > > vhost-user-backend crate do not negotiate > > VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_RESET_DEVICE automatically. > > - vhost-vdpa: an extra SET_STATUS 0 call is made during device reset. > > > > I have tested this series with vhost-net (kernel), vhost-user-blk, and > > vhost-user-fs (both Rust and legacy C). > > > > Stefan Hajnoczi (3): > > vhost-user: do not send RESET_OWNER on device reset > > vhost-backend: remove vhost_kernel_reset_device() > > virtio: call ->vhost_reset_device() during reset > > Build failure: > https://gitlab.com/mstredhat/qemu/-/jobs/5215049540
Sorry about that, will fix. Stefan > > include/hw/virtio/vhost.h | 3 +++ > > hw/scsi/vhost-user-scsi.c | 20 -------------------- > > hw/virtio/vhost-backend.c | 6 ------ > > hw/virtio/vhost-user.c | 13 +++++++++---- > > hw/virtio/vhost.c | 9 +++++++++ > > hw/virtio/virtio.c | 4 ++++ > > 6 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) > > > > -- > > 2.41.0 > >
