Il 28/02/2012 12:09, Igor Mitsyanko ha scritto: > > Perhaps >> type_late_init would be a better name. > > How about simple type_initialization()?
We use verbs, so it would be type_initialize, but yes. Paolo
Il 28/02/2012 12:09, Igor Mitsyanko ha scritto: > > Perhaps >> type_late_init would be a better name. > > How about simple type_initialization()?
We use verbs, so it would be type_initialize, but yes. Paolo