On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 06:18:04PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 26 February 2012 13:30, Stefan Weil <s...@weilnetz.de> wrote: > > @@ -217,10 +217,10 @@ the card using the following functions: > > VCardStatus vcard_add_applet(VCard *card, VCardApplet *applet); > > > > Add an applet onto the list of applets attached to the card. Once an > > applet > > - has been added, it can be selected by it's aid, and then commands will be > > + has been added, it can be selected by its aid, and then commands will be > > While you're changing this line, it looks like 'aid' here should be 'AID' > (it is capitalised elsewhere in the doc except where referring to a function > parameter name). > > > routed to it VCardProcessAPDU function. This function adopts the applet > > the > > passed int applet. > > The sentence "This function..." clearly needs correcting as it doesn't > make much sense as it stands, but I'm not sure what it should be changed to.
Asked Robert Relyea (rrel...@redhat.com - I guess he should be in MAINTAINERS, although he is not..) and the answer was: This function adopts the applet that is passed into it. > > > Note: 2 applets with the same AID should not be added to > > - the same card. It's permissible to add more than one applet. Multiple > > applets > > + the same card. It is permissible to add more than one applet. Multiple > > applets > > may have the same VCardPRocessAPDU entry point. > > -- PMM >
