On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:42:31 -0600 Anthony Liguori <anth...@codemonkey.ws> wrote:
> On 02/27/2012 10:33 AM, Federico Simoncelli wrote: > > I'm all for the modularity of the commands (I suggested it since the > > beginning), > > but all this infrastructure goes way beyond what I'd need for oVirt now. > > > > When I submitted my patches we knew that my work wasn't the definitive > > solution > > (eg: the future implementation of -blockdev). So I'd suggest to try and > > settle > > with something that is good enough and that is not preventing a future > > improvement. > > > > What about having a (temporary) flag in drive-mirror to accept also a > > new-image-file > > until we will have the optimal solution? > > Unless there are extenuating circumstances (like the absence of core > infrastructure in QEMU), then we should not add commands that we know are not > the right command. > > We have to support our commands forever. Agreed. Worst case we have vendor extension support that downstream can use to add its own commands.
