On 2022/11/25 23:06, Akihiko Odaki wrote:
resettable_class_set_parent_phases() was mistakenly called
resettable_class_set_parent_reset_phases() in some places.
Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.od...@daynix.com>
---
docs/devel/reset.rst | 17 ++++++++---------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/docs/devel/reset.rst b/docs/devel/reset.rst
index 7cc6a6b314..38ed1790f7 100644
--- a/docs/devel/reset.rst
+++ b/docs/devel/reset.rst
@@ -184,21 +184,20 @@ in reset.
{
MyDevClass *myclass = MYDEV_CLASS(class);
ResettableClass *rc = RESETTABLE_CLASS(class);
- resettable_class_set_parent_reset_phases(rc,
- mydev_reset_enter,
- mydev_reset_hold,
- mydev_reset_exit,
- &myclass->parent_phases);
+ resettable_class_set_parent_phases(rc,
+ mydev_reset_enter,
+ mydev_reset_hold,
+ mydev_reset_exit,
+ &myclass->parent_phases);
}
In the above example, we override all three phases. It is possible to override
only some of them by passing NULL instead of a function pointer to
-``resettable_class_set_parent_reset_phases()``. For example, the following will
+``resettable_class_set_parent_phases()``. For example, the following will
only override the *enter* phase and leave *hold* and *exit* untouched::
- resettable_class_set_parent_reset_phases(rc, mydev_reset_enter,
- NULL, NULL,
- &myclass->parent_phases);
+ resettable_class_set_parent_phases(rc, mydev_reset_enter, NULL, NULL,
+ &myclass->parent_phases);
This is equivalent to providing a trivial implementation of the hold and exit
phases which does nothing but call the parent class's implementation of the
Hi,
This patch seems to have been forgotten. Can anyone pull this?
Regards,
Akihiko Odaki
