On 02/25/2012 03:21 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 25.02.2012 22:12, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 02/25/2012 02:19 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 02/25/2012 08:42 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
This involves replacing the local APIC with the qtest interrupt
controller.
It should be pretty straight forward to do the same for other machine
types.
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori<aligu...@us.ibm.com>
---
hw/pc_piix.c | 3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/pc_piix.c b/hw/pc_piix.c
index 5e11d15..2c0881e 100644
--- a/hw/pc_piix.c
+++ b/hw/pc_piix.c
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_XEN
# include<xen/hvm/hvm_info_table.h>
#endif
+#include "qtest.h"
#define MAX_IDE_BUS 2
@@ -212,6 +213,8 @@ static void pc_init1(MemoryRegion *system_memory,
i8259 = kvm_i8259_init(isa_bus);
} else if (xen_enabled()) {
i8259 = xen_interrupt_controller_init();
+ } else if (qtest_enabled()) {
+ i8259 = qtest_interrupt_controller_init();
} else {
cpu_irq = pc_allocate_cpu_irq();
i8259 = i8259_init(isa_bus, cpu_irq[0]);
This is not needed anymore.
Why? This is necessary for IRQ to work.
You mean, if you use irq_intercept, this isn't needed?
The reason for Paolo's RFC was to _avoid_ having to touch every target
with code such as the above, no?
I misunderstood. I thought irq_intercept was intercepting the RTC IRQ. I now
see it's intercepting the I/O APIC irqs.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
Andreas
