On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 10:08:47AM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> riscv_cpu_add_misa_properties() is being used to fill the missing KVM
> MISA properties but it is a TCG helper that was adapted to do so. We'll
> move it to tcg-cpu.c in the next patches, meaning that KVM needs to fill
> the remaining MISA properties on its own.
>
> Do not use riscv_cpu_add_misa_properties(). Let's create a new array
> with all available MISA bits we support that can be read by KVM. Then,
> inside kvm_riscv_add_cpu_user_properties(), we'll create all KVM MISA
> properties as usual and then use this array to add any missing MISA
> properties with the riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop() helper.
>
> Note that we're creating misa_bits[], and not using the existing
> 'riscv_single_letter_exts[]', because the latter is tuned for riscv,isa
> related functions and it doesn't have all MISA bits we support. Commit
> 0e2c377023 ("target/riscv: misa to ISA string conversion fix") has the
> full context.
>
> While we're at it, move both satp and the multi-letter extension
> properties to kvm_riscv_add_cpu_user_properties() as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarb...@ventanamicro.com>
> ---
> target/riscv/cpu.c | 2 ++
> target/riscv/cpu.h | 3 ++-
> target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c | 17 +++++++++++------
> 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> index bf6c8519b1..f9aea6a80a 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@
>
> /* RISC-V CPU definitions */
> static const char riscv_single_letter_exts[] = "IEMAFDQCPVH";
> +const uint32_t misa_bits[] = {RVI, RVE, RVM, RVA, RVF, RVD, RVV,
> + RVC, RVS, RVU, RVH, RVJ, RVG};
>
> struct isa_ext_data {
> const char *name;
> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.h b/target/riscv/cpu.h
> index 950c2301f2..9ec3b98bd2 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/cpu.h
> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.h
> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@
> #define RV(x) ((target_ulong)1 << (x - 'A'))
>
> /*
> - * Consider updating misa_ext_info_arr[] and misa_ext_cfgs[]
> + * Update misa_bits[], misa_ext_info_arr[] and misa_ext_cfgs[]
> * when adding new MISA bits here.
> */
> #define RVI RV('I')
> @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@
> #define RVJ RV('J')
> #define RVG RV('G')
>
> +extern const uint32_t misa_bits[13];
^ maintaining this will be a PITA
I suggest misa_bits either have a terminating zero (zero is an invalid bit
number) or that a const nr_misa_bits is also exported from riscv/cpu.c
which be set to ARRAY_SIZE(misa_bits) and would be used for the loop
condition.
> const char *riscv_get_misa_ext_name(uint32_t bit);
> const char *riscv_get_misa_ext_description(uint32_t bit);
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c b/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
> index 85e8b0a927..501384924b 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
> @@ -387,6 +387,8 @@ static void kvm_riscv_add_cpu_user_properties(Object
> *cpu_obj)
> {
> int i;
>
> + riscv_add_satp_mode_properties(cpu_obj);
> +
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(kvm_misa_ext_cfgs); i++) {
> KVMCPUConfig *misa_cfg = &kvm_misa_ext_cfgs[i];
> int bit = misa_cfg->offset;
> @@ -402,6 +404,11 @@ static void kvm_riscv_add_cpu_user_properties(Object
> *cpu_obj)
> misa_cfg->description);
> }
>
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(misa_bits); i++) {
> + const char *ext_name = riscv_get_misa_ext_name(misa_bits[i]);
> + riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop(cpu_obj, ext_name);
> + }
> +
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(kvm_multi_ext_cfgs); i++) {
> KVMCPUConfig *multi_cfg = &kvm_multi_ext_cfgs[i];
>
> @@ -418,6 +425,10 @@ static void kvm_riscv_add_cpu_user_properties(Object
> *cpu_obj)
> object_property_add(cpu_obj, "cboz_blocksize", "uint16",
> NULL, kvm_cpu_set_cbomz_blksize,
> NULL, &kvm_cboz_blocksize);
> +
> + riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop_array(cpu_obj, riscv_cpu_extensions);
> + riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop_array(cpu_obj, riscv_cpu_vendor_exts);
> + riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop_array(cpu_obj,
> riscv_cpu_experimental_exts);
> }
>
> static int kvm_riscv_get_regs_core(CPUState *cs)
> @@ -1301,12 +1312,6 @@ static void kvm_cpu_instance_init(CPUState *cs)
>
> if (rcc->user_extension_properties) {
> kvm_riscv_add_cpu_user_properties(obj);
> - riscv_add_satp_mode_properties(obj);
> - riscv_cpu_add_misa_properties(obj);
> -
> - riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop_array(obj, riscv_cpu_extensions);
> - riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop_array(obj, riscv_cpu_vendor_exts);
> - riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop_array(obj,
> riscv_cpu_experimental_exts);
> }
>
> for (Property *prop = riscv_cpu_options; prop && prop->name; prop++) {
> --
> 2.41.0
>
>
Otherwise,
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajo...@ventanamicro.com>
