On 29/08/2023 20.45, Warner Losh wrote:
Replace the slightly older version of this in include/qemu/compiler.h
that was commit as part of bsd-user changes with the newer one from

s/commit/committed/ ?

linux-user. bsd-user has no regreassions with this.

s/regreassions/regressions/

Signed-off-by: Warner Losh <i...@bsdimp.com>
---
  include/qemu/compiler.h  |  3 +--
  linux-user/qemu.h        | 26 --------------------------
  tests/lcitool/libvirt-ci |  2 +-
  3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/qemu/compiler.h b/include/qemu/compiler.h
index b0374425180..9496a65ea57 100644
--- a/include/qemu/compiler.h
+++ b/include/qemu/compiler.h
@@ -38,10 +38,9 @@
   *   https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83256 -- so we only
   *   include the warning-suppression pragmas for clang
   */
-#ifdef __clang__
+#if defined(__clang__) && __has_warning("-Waddress-of-packed-member")
  #define PRAGMA_DISABLE_PACKED_WARNING                                   \
      _Pragma("GCC diagnostic push");                                     \
-    _Pragma("GCC diagnostic ignored \"-Wpragmas\"");                    \
      _Pragma("GCC diagnostic ignored \"-Waddress-of-packed-member\"")
#define PRAGMA_REENABLE_PACKED_WARNING \
diff --git a/linux-user/qemu.h b/linux-user/qemu.h
index 4f8b55e2fb0..12821e54d0a 100644
--- a/linux-user/qemu.h
+++ b/linux-user/qemu.h
@@ -193,32 +193,6 @@ static inline bool access_ok(CPUState *cpu, int type,
     These are usually used to access struct data members once the struct has
     been locked - usually with lock_user_struct.  */
-/*
- * Tricky points:
- * - Use __builtin_choose_expr to avoid type promotion from ?:,
- * - Invalid sizes result in a compile time error stemming from
- *   the fact that abort has no parameters.
- * - It's easier to use the endian-specific unaligned load/store
- *   functions than host-endian unaligned load/store plus tswapN.
- * - The pragmas are necessary only to silence a clang false-positive
- *   warning: see https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39113 .
- * - gcc has bugs in its _Pragma() support in some versions, eg
- *   https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83256 -- so we only
- *   include the warning-suppression pragmas for clang
- */
-#if defined(__clang__) && __has_warning("-Waddress-of-packed-member")
-#define PRAGMA_DISABLE_PACKED_WARNING                                   \
-    _Pragma("GCC diagnostic push");                                     \
-    _Pragma("GCC diagnostic ignored \"-Waddress-of-packed-member\"")
-
-#define PRAGMA_REENABLE_PACKED_WARNING          \
-    _Pragma("GCC diagnostic pop")
-
-#else
-#define PRAGMA_DISABLE_PACKED_WARNING
-#define PRAGMA_REENABLE_PACKED_WARNING
-#endif
-
  #define __put_user_e(x, hptr, e)                                            \
      do {                                                                    \
          PRAGMA_DISABLE_PACKED_WARNING;                                      \
diff --git a/tests/lcitool/libvirt-ci b/tests/lcitool/libvirt-ci
index bbd55b4d18c..9bff3b763b5 160000
--- a/tests/lcitool/libvirt-ci
+++ b/tests/lcitool/libvirt-ci
@@ -1 +1 @@
-Subproject commit bbd55b4d18cce8f89b5167675e434a6941315634
+Subproject commit 9bff3b763b5531a1490e238bfbf77306dc3a6dbb

Accidentially committed the libvirt-ci submodule change?

 Thomas


Reply via email to