On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 7:32 AM Mark Cave-Ayland <
mark.cave-ayl...@ilande.co.uk> wrote:

> On 17/08/2023 03:23, Gurchetan Singh wrote:
>
> > From: Gurchetan Singh <gurchetansi...@chromium.org>
> >
> > This modifies the common virtio-gpu.h file have the fields and
> > defintions needed by gfxstream/rutabaga, by VirtioGpuRutabaga.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gurchetan Singh <gurchetansi...@chromium.org>
> > Tested-by: Alyssa Ross <h...@alyssa.is>
> > Tested-by: Emmanouil Pitsidianakis <manos.pitsidiana...@linaro.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Emmanouil Pitsidianakis <manos.pitsidiana...@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > v1: void *rutabaga --> struct rutabaga *rutabaga (Akihiko)
> >      have a separate rutabaga device instead of using GL device (Bernard)
> >
> > v2: VirtioGpuRutabaga --> VirtIOGPURutabaga (Akihiko)
> >      move MemoryRegionInfo into VirtIOGPURutabaga (Akihiko)
> >      remove 'ctx' field (Akihiko)
> >      remove 'rutabaga_active'
> >
> > v6: remove command from commit message, refer to docs instead (Manos)
> >
> >   include/hw/virtio/virtio-gpu.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/hw/virtio/virtio-gpu.h
> b/include/hw/virtio/virtio-gpu.h
> > index 55973e112f..e2a07e68d9 100644
> > --- a/include/hw/virtio/virtio-gpu.h
> > +++ b/include/hw/virtio/virtio-gpu.h
> > @@ -38,6 +38,9 @@ OBJECT_DECLARE_SIMPLE_TYPE(VirtIOGPUGL, VIRTIO_GPU_GL)
> >   #define TYPE_VHOST_USER_GPU "vhost-user-gpu"
> >   OBJECT_DECLARE_SIMPLE_TYPE(VhostUserGPU, VHOST_USER_GPU)
> >
> > +#define TYPE_VIRTIO_GPU_RUTABAGA "virtio-gpu-rutabaga-device"
> > +OBJECT_DECLARE_SIMPLE_TYPE(VirtIOGPURutabaga, VIRTIO_GPU_RUTABAGA)
> > +
> >   struct virtio_gpu_simple_resource {
> >       uint32_t resource_id;
> >       uint32_t width;
> > @@ -94,6 +97,7 @@ enum virtio_gpu_base_conf_flags {
> >       VIRTIO_GPU_FLAG_DMABUF_ENABLED,
> >       VIRTIO_GPU_FLAG_BLOB_ENABLED,
> >       VIRTIO_GPU_FLAG_CONTEXT_INIT_ENABLED,
> > +    VIRTIO_GPU_FLAG_RUTABAGA_ENABLED,
> >   };
> >
> >   #define virtio_gpu_virgl_enabled(_cfg) \
> > @@ -108,6 +112,8 @@ enum virtio_gpu_base_conf_flags {
> >       (_cfg.flags & (1 << VIRTIO_GPU_FLAG_BLOB_ENABLED))
> >   #define virtio_gpu_context_init_enabled(_cfg) \
> >       (_cfg.flags & (1 << VIRTIO_GPU_FLAG_CONTEXT_INIT_ENABLED))
> > +#define virtio_gpu_rutabaga_enabled(_cfg) \
> > +    (_cfg.flags & (1 << VIRTIO_GPU_FLAG_RUTABAGA_ENABLED))
> >   #define virtio_gpu_hostmem_enabled(_cfg) \
> >       (_cfg.hostmem > 0)
> >
> > @@ -232,6 +238,28 @@ struct VhostUserGPU {
> >       bool backend_blocked;
> >   };
> >
> > +#define MAX_SLOTS 4096
> > +
> > +struct MemoryRegionInfo {
> > +    int used;
> > +    MemoryRegion mr;
> > +    uint32_t resource_id;
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct rutabaga;
> > +
> > +struct VirtIOGPURutabaga {
> > +    struct VirtIOGPU parent_obj;
>
> The QOM macro should define a typedef for you, so you can drop the
> "struct" here.
>
> > +
> > +    struct MemoryRegionInfo memory_regions[MAX_SLOTS];
> > +    char *capset_names;
> > +    char *wayland_socket_path;
> > +    char *wsi;
> > +    bool headless;
> > +    uint32_t num_capsets;
> > +    struct rutabaga *rutabaga;
> > +};
> > +
>
> Shouldn't the VIRTIO_GPU_RUTABAGA QOM declaration and this structure be in
> a separate
> virtio-gpu-rutabaga header file which also includes the header defining
> struct
> rutabaga? The fact that you're having to pre-declare struct rutabaga in
> this header
> when rutabaga support is an optional dependency doesn't seem right.
>

It is the prevailing style of the virtio-gpu code.  For example, we do have
"virtio_gpu_virgl_*" functions, vhost-user, and udmabuf stubs in the same
file.  So for now, I didn't add an extra header file in v12.  In the
future, separating out optional dependencies into constituent header files
could be future refactoring/cleanup.


>
> >   #define VIRTIO_GPU_FILL_CMD(out) do {
>  \
> >           size_t s;
>  \
> >           s = iov_to_buf(cmd->elem.out_sg, cmd->elem.out_num, 0,
>   \
>
>
> ATB,
>
> Mark.
>
>

Reply via email to