On 22/8/23 15:28, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 22/8/23 14:51, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@linaro.org>
---
  target/loongarch/insn_trans/trans_bit.c.inc | 15 +--------------
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/loongarch/insn_trans/trans_bit.c.inc b/target/loongarch/insn_trans/trans_bit.c.inc
index 95b4ee5bc8..c04806dc21 100644
--- a/target/loongarch/insn_trans/trans_bit.c.inc
+++ b/target/loongarch/insn_trans/trans_bit.c.inc
@@ -124,19 +124,6 @@ static void gen_revb_2h(TCGv dest, TCGv src1)
      tcg_gen_or_tl(dest, t0, t1);
  }
-static void gen_revb_4h(TCGv dest, TCGv src1)
-{
-    TCGv mask = tcg_constant_tl(0x00FF00FF00FF00FFULL);
-    TCGv t0 = tcg_temp_new();
-    TCGv t1 = tcg_temp_new();
-
-    tcg_gen_shri_tl(t0, src1, 8);
-    tcg_gen_and_tl(t0, t0, mask);
-    tcg_gen_and_tl(t1, src1, mask);
-    tcg_gen_shli_tl(t1, t1, 8);
-    tcg_gen_or_tl(dest, t0, t1);
-}
-
  static void gen_revh_2w(TCGv dest, TCGv src1)
  {
      TCGv_i64 t0 = tcg_temp_new_i64();
@@ -175,7 +162,7 @@ TRANS(clz_d, gen_rr, EXT_NONE, EXT_NONE, gen_clz_d)
  TRANS(cto_d, gen_rr, EXT_NONE, EXT_NONE, gen_cto_d)
  TRANS(ctz_d, gen_rr, EXT_NONE, EXT_NONE, gen_ctz_d)
  TRANS(revb_2h, gen_rr, EXT_NONE, EXT_SIGN, gen_revb_2h)
-TRANS(revb_4h, gen_rr, EXT_NONE, EXT_NONE, gen_revb_4h)
+TRANS(revb_4h, gen_rr, EXT_NONE, EXT_NONE, tcg_gen_hrev64_i64)

We should use tcg_gen_hrev64_tl() instead.

Although due to the 0x00FF00FF00FF00FFULL constant it
seems gen_revb_4h() really expects i64 registers...
(see gen_revh_2w which uses TCGv_i64).

I suppose gen_revb_4h() ended that way as a copy/paste of
gen_revb_2h().

Reply via email to