On 14.08.2023 19:31, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
This runs replay-dump.py after recording a trace, and fails the test if
the script fails.
replay-dump.py is modified to exit with non-zero if an error is
encountered while parsing.
I would like to have separate test for replay-dump, because
replay-linux tests are very heavy to replay and knowing the exact
reason of the failure in advance would be more convenient.
What do you think of splitting the test?
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npig...@gmail.com>
---
It's possible this could introduce failures to existing test if an
unimplemented event gets recorded. I would make a new test for this but
it takes quite a while to record such a long trace that includes some
block and net events to excercise the script.
Thanks,
Nick
scripts/replay-dump.py | 6 ++++--
tests/avocado/replay_linux.py | 16 +++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scripts/replay-dump.py b/scripts/replay-dump.py
index 937ae19ff1..8f4715632a 100755
--- a/scripts/replay-dump.py
+++ b/scripts/replay-dump.py
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
import argparse
import struct
import os
+import sys
from collections import namedtuple
# This mirrors some of the global replay state which some of the
@@ -97,7 +98,7 @@ def call_decode(table, index, dumpfile):
print("Could not decode index: %d" % (index))
print("Entry is: %s" % (decoder))
print("Decode Table is:\n%s" % (table))
- return False
+ sys.exit(1)
else:
return decoder.fn(decoder.eid, decoder.name, dumpfile)
@@ -118,7 +119,7 @@ def print_event(eid, name, string=None, event_count=None):
def decode_unimp(eid, name, _unused_dumpfile):
"Unimplimented decoder, will trigger exit"
print("%s not handled - will now stop" % (name))
- return False
+ sys.exit(1)
# Checkpoint decoder
def swallow_async_qword(eid, name, dumpfile):
@@ -401,3 +402,4 @@ def decode_file(filename):
if __name__ == "__main__":
args = parse_arguments()
decode_file(args.file)
+ sys.exit(0)
diff --git a/tests/avocado/replay_linux.py b/tests/avocado/replay_linux.py
index a76dd507fc..12937ce0ec 100644
--- a/tests/avocado/replay_linux.py
+++ b/tests/avocado/replay_linux.py
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
import os
import logging
import time
+import subprocess
from avocado import skipUnless
from avocado_qemu import BUILD_DIR
@@ -21,6 +22,11 @@
from avocado.utils.path import find_command
from avocado_qemu import LinuxTest
+from pathlib import Path
+
+self_dir = Path(__file__).parent
+src_dir = self_dir.parent.parent
+
class ReplayLinux(LinuxTest):
"""
Boots a Linux system, checking for a successful initialization
@@ -94,7 +100,7 @@ def launch_and_wait(self, record, args, shift):
else:
vm.event_wait('SHUTDOWN', self.timeout)
vm.shutdown(True)
- logger.info('successfully fihished the replay')
+ logger.info('successfully finished the replay')
elapsed = time.time() - start_time
logger.info('elapsed time %.2f sec' % elapsed)
return elapsed
@@ -105,6 +111,14 @@ def run_rr(self, args=None, shift=7):
logger = logging.getLogger('replay')
logger.info('replay overhead {:.2%}'.format(t2 / t1 - 1))
+ try:
+ replay_path = os.path.join(self.workdir, 'replay.bin')
+ subprocess.check_call(["./scripts/replay-dump.py",
+ "-f", replay_path],
+ cwd=src_dir, stdout=subprocess.DEVNULL)
+ except subprocess.CalledProcessError:
+ self.fail('replay-dump.py failed')
+
@skipUnless(os.getenv('AVOCADO_TIMEOUT_EXPECTED'), 'Test might timeout')
class ReplayLinuxX8664(ReplayLinux):
"""