[PATCH v2] target/riscv: don't read write-only CSR

[Nikita Shubin]

From: Nikita Shubin <n.shu...@yadro.com>

In case of write-only CSR don't return illegal inst error when CSR is
written and lacks read op.

Signed-off-by: Nikita Shubin <n.shu...@yadro.com>
---
Changelog:
- fixed uninitialized old_value

Anyway it not might be a good idea to read CSR when we are not asked
for, during CSRRW or CSRRWI:

"For CSRRWI, if rd=x0, then the instruction shall not read the CSR and
shall not cause any of the side effects that might occur on a CSR read."

May be i am missing something of course.
---
 target/riscv/csr.c | 21 ++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/riscv/csr.c b/target/riscv/csr.c
index ea7585329e..3f0b3277e4 100644
--- a/target/riscv/csr.c
+++ b/target/riscv/csr.c
@@ -3908,21 +3908,24 @@ static RISCVException riscv_csrrw_do64(CPURISCVState 
*env, int csrno,
                                        target_ulong write_mask)
 {
     RISCVException ret;
-    target_ulong old_value;
+    target_ulong old_value = 0;
 
     /* execute combined read/write operation if it exists */
     if (csr_ops[csrno].op) {
         return csr_ops[csrno].op(env, csrno, ret_value, new_value, write_mask);
     }
 
-    /* if no accessor exists then return failure */
-    if (!csr_ops[csrno].read) {
-        return RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST;
-    }
-    /* read old value */
-    ret = csr_ops[csrno].read(env, csrno, &old_value);
-    if (ret != RISCV_EXCP_NONE) {
-        return ret;
+    /* don't read if ret_value==NULL */
+    if (ret_value) {
+        /* if no accessor exists then return failure */
+        if (!csr_ops[csrno].read) {
+            return RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST;
+        }
+        /* read old value */
+        ret = csr_ops[csrno].read(env, csrno, &old_value);
+        if (ret != RISCV_EXCP_NONE) {
+            return ret;
+        }
     }
 
     /* write value if writable and write mask set, otherwise drop writes */
-- 
2.39.2