On 2023/7/15 01:43, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
The code inside riscv_cpu_add_user_properties() became quite repetitive
after recent changes. Add a macro to hide the repetition away.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarb...@ventanamicro.com>
---

Reviewed-by: Weiwei Li <liwei...@iscas.ac.cn>

Weiwei Li

  target/riscv/cpu.c | 21 ++++++++++-----------
  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
index 5689368f02..f7083b2d5c 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
@@ -1875,6 +1875,13 @@ static void cpu_set_cfg_unavailable(Object *obj, Visitor 
*v,
  }
  #endif
+#define ADD_CPU_PROPERTIES_ARRAY(_dev, _array) \
+    do { \
+        for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(_array); i++) { \
+            qdev_property_add_static(_dev, &_array[i]); \
+        } \
+    } while (0)
+
  /*
   * Add CPU properties with user-facing flags.
   *
@@ -1918,17 +1925,9 @@ static void riscv_cpu_add_user_properties(Object *obj)
          qdev_property_add_static(dev, prop);
      }
- for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(riscv_cpu_options); i++) {
-        qdev_property_add_static(dev, &riscv_cpu_options[i]);
-    }
-
-    for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(riscv_cpu_vendor_exts); i++) {
-        qdev_property_add_static(dev, &riscv_cpu_vendor_exts[i]);
-    }
-
-    for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(riscv_cpu_experimental_exts); i++) {
-        qdev_property_add_static(dev, &riscv_cpu_experimental_exts[i]);
-    }
+    ADD_CPU_PROPERTIES_ARRAY(dev, riscv_cpu_options);
+    ADD_CPU_PROPERTIES_ARRAY(dev, riscv_cpu_vendor_exts);
+    ADD_CPU_PROPERTIES_ARRAY(dev, riscv_cpu_experimental_exts);
  }
static Property riscv_cpu_properties[] = {


Reply via email to