> On 11-Jul-2023, at 9:43 AM, Michael Tokarev <m...@tls.msk.ru> wrote:
>
> 11.07.2023 07:03, Ani Sinha wrote:
>>> On 11-Jul-2023, at 9:21 AM, Michael Tokarev <m...@tls.msk.ru> wrote:
>>>
>>> 11.07.2023 06:46, Ani Sinha wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sure. Since this is only a comment addition, should I also CC qemu-trivial?
>>>
>>> A comment change does not mean the change is trivial. It's a trivial in a
>>> sense
>>> the code changes are trivial (actually not-existent), but the meaning of
>>> the comment
>>> is not trivial at all. I for one know nothing about this.
>> This comment was already discussed in qemu-devel between me, mst and Igor.
>> Perhaps you missed it.
>
> It doesn't matter really. The thing is that it needs explanation, hence it is
> not "trivial",
> that's what I tried to say. It is trivial for sure for someone who knows this
> particular
> subsystem well enough, - I'm not one of them ;)
That’s ok. I was commenting on your statement " I for one know nothing about
this.” I wanted to make sure that people know that patches (at least those I
post) are going though the qemu-devel list in a transparent way. It's up to
those who are interested or have expertise in a certain area to monitor the
list and review/comment on patches. If they want to be explicitly CC’d they can
add themselves to MAINTAINERS. The tooling would ensure that they are added in
the CC when certain files are updated or modified in the patches.
