> On 27-Jun-2023, at 3:23 PM, Ani Sinha <anisi...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 27-Jun-2023, at 2:32 PM, Igor Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 26 Jun 2023 21:42:44 +0530
>> Ani Sinha <anisi...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> PCI Express ports only have one slot, so PCI Express devices can only be
>>> plugged into slot 0 on a PCIE port. Enforce it.
>>
>> btw, previously you mentioned ARI.
>> So if we turn it on, wouldn't this patch actually become regression?
Looking at
https://pcisig.com/sites/default/files/specification_documents/ECN-alt-rid-interpretation-070604.pdf,
section 7.23, seems a root port does not support ARI but it can support ARI
forwarding capability (section 7.8.5).
Also with ARI enabled, the device cannot have a non-zero device number. Also,
shouldn't any code path that uses PCI_SLOT() should probably also check for ARI
if it wants to be ARI complaint?
Anyways these are just facts I could find but I am not sure if this would
answer your above question.
>
> If ARI breaks this, it will break other areas in QEMU too, ex anywhere
> pci_get_function_0() is used.
> Regardless, I think at least the tests are worth fixing, particularly the
> mess with hd-geo-test.
>
>>
>>>
>>> CC: jus...@redhat.com
>>> CC: imamm...@redhat.com
>>> Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2128929
>>> Signed-off-by: Ani Sinha <anisi...@redhat.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Julia Suvorova <jus...@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> hw/pci/pci.c | 6 ++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/pci/pci.c b/hw/pci/pci.c
>>> index bf38905b7d..426af133b0 100644
>>> --- a/hw/pci/pci.c
>>> +++ b/hw/pci/pci.c
>>> @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ bool pci_available = true;
>>> static char *pcibus_get_dev_path(DeviceState *dev);
>>> static char *pcibus_get_fw_dev_path(DeviceState *dev);
>>> static void pcibus_reset(BusState *qbus);
>>> +static bool pcie_has_upstream_port(PCIDevice *dev);
>>>
>>> static Property pci_props[] = {
>>> DEFINE_PROP_PCI_DEVFN("addr", PCIDevice, devfn, -1),
>>> @@ -1189,6 +1190,11 @@ static PCIDevice *do_pci_register_device(PCIDevice
>>> *pci_dev,
>>> name);
>>>
>>> return NULL;
>>> + } else if (pcie_has_upstream_port(pci_dev) && PCI_SLOT(devfn)) {
>>> + error_setg(errp, "PCI: slot %d is not valid for %s,"
>>> + " parent device only allows plugging into slot 0.",
>>> + PCI_SLOT(devfn), name);
>>> + return NULL;
>>> }
>>>
>>> pci_dev->devfn = devfn;
>>
>
