On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 10:30 PM Alistair Francis <alistai...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > + > > + object_class_property_add_str(oc, "density", stm32f100_get_density, > > + stm32f100_set_density); > > + object_class_property_set_description(oc, "density", > > + "Set the STM32F100 density line device. " > > + "Valid values are 'low', 'medium', and 'high' (default)."); > > } > > This should be split into a separate commit from adding the machine > Ok, I'll do that. > Isn't this exactly the same as the stm32vldiscovery board? Which is > already very similar to the netduino2 machine. I'm not sure we need > another machine. > > It could make more sense to deprecate the stm32vldiscovery machine and > replace it with this generic one. At least we could keep everything in > the one file and reuse a lot of the code. > What is the protocol for deprecating a machine? Should I just submit a patch that removes it along with the corresponding entry in the MAINTAINERS file? Should I coordinate that offline with the maintainer of the machine that's to be retired? Thanks, Lucas
