Am 13.02.2012 17:11, schrieb Alex Barcelo: > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 16:57, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote: >> You should (need to?) use version 2.1 or later above then, too. You can >> then simply move this snippet up and drop the "Same license ..." line. > > I wanted to ask this, but it slipped my mind. So it's ok to change the > header to a newer GNU version. I will update it in the PATCH v2.
IANAL. It looked like you were adding a new file, so you can choose any Open Source license that's compatible with the code that gets linked together. Coroutines need to be compatible with parts of QEMU under GPLv2, so LGPLv2.1 is the newest we can go AFAIU. Further, there is no GNU Lesser General Public License 2.0, only 2.1: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl-2.1.html 2.0 was the GNU Library General Public License: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/lgpl-2.0.html So this may even just be a typo somewhere. Andreas -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
