On 6/16/23 17:27, Bin Meng wrote:
+ qemu_close_range(0, ~0U);
This is clearly assuming that close_range exists. Should qemu_close_range attempt to lower last if >= _SC_OPEN_MAX? Or better to use that here. r~
On 6/16/23 17:27, Bin Meng wrote:
+ qemu_close_range(0, ~0U);
This is clearly assuming that close_range exists. Should qemu_close_range attempt to lower last if >= _SC_OPEN_MAX? Or better to use that here. r~