On Fri, 26 May 2023 at 00:27, Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org> wrote: > > While we don't require 16-byte atomicity here, using a single larger > load simplifies the code, and makes it a closer match to STXP. > > Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> thanks -- PMM