On Fri, 26 May 2023 at 00:27, Richard Henderson
<richard.hender...@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> While we don't require 16-byte atomicity here, using a single larger
> load simplifies the code, and makes it a closer match to STXP.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org>

Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>

thanks
-- PMM

Reply via email to