On Tue, 2023-05-16 at 14:47 +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote: > On 5/16/23 11:24, Juan Quintela wrote: > > David Edmondson <david.edmond...@oracle.com> wrote: > > > Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com> writes: > > > > > > > Define and use RATE_LIMIT_MAX instead. > > > > > > Suggest "RATE_LIMIT_MAX_NONE". > > > > Then even better > > > > RATE_LIMIT_DISABLED? > > I'd vote for RATE_LIMIT_DISABLED.
Me too. > > > RATE_LIMIT_NONE? > > > > Using MAX and NONE at the same time looks strange. > > Cheers, > > C. > Reviewed-by: Leonardo Bras <leob...@redhat.com>
