On 08/05/2023 16.27, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 03/05/2023 09.23, Richard Henderson wrote:
If CONFIG_USER_ONLY is ok generically, so is CONFIG_SOFTMMU,
because they are exactly opposite.
I thought there was a difference ... at least in the past?
But looking at meson.build they seem to be handled quite equally now:
common_ss.add_all(when: 'CONFIG_SOFTMMU', if_true: [softmmu_ss])
common_ss.add_all(when: 'CONFIG_USER_ONLY', if_true: user_ss)
Paolo, do you remember whether there was a difference in the past?
Anyway, as far as I can see, it should be fine now, so:
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com>
For the records, I withdraw my Reviewed-by here (since we should rather do
it the other way round and poison CONFIG_USER_ONLY instead):
Nacked-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com>
