On Mon, 08 May 2023 10:12:35 +0200 Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Lukas Straub <lukasstra...@web.de> wrote: > > On Tue, 02 May 2023 12:39:12 +0200 > > Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > >> [...] > >> > >> my patches are only code movement and cleanups, so Lukas any clue? > >> > >> Lukas, I am going to drop the compress code for now and pass the other > >> patches. In the meanwhile, I am going to try to setup some machine > >> where I can run the upstream tests and see if I can reproduce there. > >> BTW, I would be happy if you double check that I did the rebase > >> correctly, they didn't apply correctly, but as said, the tests have been > >> running for two/three days on all my daily testing, so I thought that I > >> did the things correctly. > > Hi > > > Hi, > > I rebased the series here and got exactly the same files as in this > > pull request. And I can't reproduce these failures either. > > Nice > > > Maybe you can run the CI just on the newly added compress tests and see > > if it already blows up without the refactoring? > > It does, I don't have to check O:-) > > The initial reason that I did the compression code on top of multifd was > that I was not able to get the old compression code to run "reliabely" > on my testing. > > > Anyway, this series is not so important anymore... > > What about: > - I add the series as they are, because the code is better than what we > have before (and being in a different file makes it easier to > deprecate, not compile, ...) > - I just disable the tests until we find something that works. > > Richard, Lukas? That is fine with me. > > Later, Juan. > > >> Richard, once that we are here, one of the problem that we are having is > >> that the test is exiting with an abort, so we have no clue what is > >> happening. Is there a way to get a backtrace, or at least the number > >> > >> Later, Juan. > >> >
pgpysUxiVaor9.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
