Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com> wrote: > Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org> wrote: >> On 4/22/23 10:21, Juan Quintela wrote: >>> Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org> wrote: >>>> On 4/20/23 14:17, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> I'll note that mips32 and armv6 (that is, *not* debian's armv7 based >> armhf distro) are the only hosts we have that don't have an atomic >> 8-byte operation. > > This is the kind of trouble that I don'k now what to do. I am pretty > sure that nobody is goigng to migrate a host that has so much RAM than > needs a 64bit counter in that two architectures (or any 32 architectures > for what is worth). > > A couple of minutes after sending the 1st email, I considederd sending > another one saying "my toolchain lies better than yours". > > I moved the atomic operations that do the buildcheck and run make again: > > $ rm -f qemu-system-mips* > $ time make > > [....] > > [2/5] Linking target qemu-system-mipsel > [3/5] Linking target qemu-system-mips > [4/5] Linking target qemu-system-mips64el > [5/5] Linking target qemu-system-mips64 > > So clearly my toolchain is lying O:-) And here I am. Wearing a brow paper bag on my head for week. These are emulatores for mips. Not cross-compiled to run on MIPS. /me hides on the hills in shame. Later, Juan.
