On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 7:18 PM Alexandre Ghiti <alexgh...@rivosinc.com> wrote: > > As per the specification, in 64-bit, if any of the pte reserved bits 60-54 > is set, an exception should be triggered (see 4.4.1, "Addressing and Memory > Protection"), so implement this behaviour in the address translation process. > > Reported-by: Andrea Parri <and...@rivosinc.com> > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexgh...@rivosinc.com> > --- > target/riscv/cpu_bits.h | 1 + > target/riscv/cpu_helper.c | 5 +++++ > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h b/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h > index fca7ef0cef..8d9ba2ce11 100644 > --- a/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h > +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h > @@ -640,6 +640,7 @@ typedef enum { > #define PTE_SOFT 0x300 /* Reserved for Software */ > #define PTE_PBMT 0x6000000000000000ULL /* Page-based memory types > */ > #define PTE_N 0x8000000000000000ULL /* NAPOT translation */ > +#define PTE_RESERVED 0x1FC0000000000000ULL /* Reserved bits */ > #define PTE_ATTR (PTE_N | PTE_PBMT) /* All attributes bits */ > > /* Page table PPN shift amount */ > diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c > index f88c503cf4..39c323a865 100644 > --- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c > +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c > @@ -936,6 +936,11 @@ restart: > return TRANSLATE_FAIL; > } > > + /* PTE reserved bits must be cleared otherwise an exception is > raised */ > + if (riscv_cpu_mxl(env) == MXL_RV64 && (pte & PTE_RESERVED)) { > + return TRANSLATE_FAIL; > + }
Isn't this caught by our existing check? if ((pte & ~(target_ulong)PTE_PPN_MASK) >> PTE_PPN_SHIFT) { return TRANSLATE_FAIL; } Alistair > + > bool pbmte = env->menvcfg & MENVCFG_PBMTE; > bool hade = env->menvcfg & MENVCFG_HADE; > > -- > 2.37.2 > >