On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 05:24:36PM +0300, Anton Kuchin wrote: > But is there a valid use-case for logging some dirty memory but not all? > I can't understand if this is a feature or a just flaw in specification.
IRC the use-case originally conceived was for shadow VQs. If you use shadow VQs the VQ access by backend does not change memory since shadow VQ is not in memory. Not a practical concern right now but there you have it. -- MST
