On 01/31/2012 10:21 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>
> License header, please. (GPLv2+ or LGPLv2+?)
Given that object.c is GPLv2+, I've sticked with that license myself;
but was that choice of license intentional? Effectively means we can't
really have any liberally-licensed device emulation. (But same holds for
MemoryAPI.)
Actually you can. It's the combination that cannot be released
liberally, but that's already the case without QOM or MemoryRegion.
If somebody wishes to port such a module to a proprietary platform
(which doesn't have QOM or other GPL bits), they can.
Paolo
