On Wed, 5 Apr 2023 04:47:48 -0400
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 10:34:44AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > with Q35 using ACPI PCI hotplug by default, user's request to unplug
> > device is ignored when it's issued before guest OS has been booted.
> > And any additional attempt to request device hot-unplug afterwards
> > results in following error:
> >
> > "Device XYZ is already in the process of unplug"
> >
> > arguably it can be considered as a regression introduced by [2],
> > before which it was possible to issue unplug request multiple
> > times.
> >
> > Allowing pending delete blocking expire brings ACPI PCI hotplug
> > on par with native PCIe unplug behavior [1] and allows user
> > to repeat unplug requests at propper times.
> > Set expire timeout to arbitrary 1msec so user won't be able to
> > flood guest with SCI interrupts by calling device_del in tight loop.
> >
> > PS:
> > ACPI spec doesn't mandate what OSPM can do with GPEx.status
> > bits set before it's booted => it's impl. depended.
> > Status bits may be retained (I tested with one Windows version)
> > or cleared (Linux since 2.6 kernel times) during guest's ACPI
> > subsystem initialization.
> > Clearing status bits (though not wrong per se) hides the unplug
> > event from guest, and it's upto user to repeat device_del later
> > when guest is able to handle unplug requests.
> >
> > 1) 18416c62e3 ("pcie: expire pending delete")
> > 2)
> > Fixes: cce8944cc9ef ("qdev-monitor: Forbid repeated device_del")
> > Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com>
>
> I feel a real solution is to detect guest handling the
> event such as clearing GPE and allowing resending
> the interrupt then.
I did consider preserving(masking clearing attempt) of GPE0.sts[]
IF en[] hasn't been enabled ever (i.e. should help with unplug at
the 1st boot). But that won't work across reboots (depends on
reboot kind) and it's twisting rules wrt spec (platform(QEMU/fw)
may set status bits, but it's upto OSPM to decide what to do with
them (when and how clear or ignore them).
> A similar strategy should be possible with the attention
> button.
>
> This patch is more of a band-aid - it is possible that guest
> rebooted and so user knows a new device_del is required,
> and we arbitrarily reject that. Right?
You lost me here. Can you elaborate?
>
> This is arguably a regression but not in this release yes?
> So I don't think it needs to block qemu release.
>
>
> > ---
> > v2:
> > * change timeout to 1ms
> > * add comment to expire usage
> > * massage commit message to be a bit more clear
> >
> > CC: m...@redhat.com
> > CC: anisi...@redhat.com
> > CC: jus...@redhat.com
> > CC: kra...@redhat.com
>
> It's helpful to have CC before --- so backporters know whom to CC, too.
ok, I'll fix it up and respin
>
> > ---
> > hw/acpi/pcihp.c | 10 ++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/acpi/pcihp.c b/hw/acpi/pcihp.c
> > index dcfb779a7a..5daa732a33 100644
> > --- a/hw/acpi/pcihp.c
> > +++ b/hw/acpi/pcihp.c
> > @@ -357,6 +357,16 @@ void
> > acpi_pcihp_device_unplug_request_cb(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev,
> > * acpi_pcihp_eject_slot() when the operation is completed.
> > */
> > pdev->qdev.pending_deleted_event = true;
> > + /* if unplug was requested before OSPM is initialized,
> > + * linux kernel will clear GPE0.sts[] bits during boot, which
> > effectively
> > + * hides unplug event. BAnd than followup qmp_device_del() calls
> > remain
>
> BAnd?
>
> > + * blocked by above flag permanently.
> > + * Unblock qmp_device_del() by setting expire limit, so user can
> > + * repeat unplug request later when OSPM has been booted.
> > + */
> > + pdev->qdev.pending_deleted_expires_ms =
> > + qemu_clock_get_ms(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL); /* 1 msec */
> > +
> > s->acpi_pcihp_pci_status[bsel].down |= (1U << slot);
> > acpi_send_event(DEVICE(hotplug_dev), ACPI_PCI_HOTPLUG_STATUS);
> > }
> > --
> > 2.39.1
>
