On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 09:47:57PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il lun 20 mar 2023, 16:42 Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> ha scritto: > > > Would it make sense to add it e.g. to "-action" instead, i.e. something > > like > > "-action teardown=async" ? > > > > -action is just a wrapper for the action-set QMP command. I don't think it > fits very well; its arguments are only guest actions while asynchronous > tear down happens for example when you issue a quit command on the monitor.
Right, we discussed -action when this feature was first proposed and that was the reason it was discounted. With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
