Am 27.01.2012 14:07, schrieb Anthony Liguori: > [...] My guess is that a SuperIO > chip could be an ISADevice and that we could simply make the PIIX3 has-a > SuperIO. Then the ISAPC would have a trivial ISA chipset that has-a > SuperIO.
That sounds pretty much like our construction site for PReP... Would you say that the SuperIO is-a ISADevice and has-a ISADevice or would you want to remodel all ISADevices associated with a Super I/O chipset as private devices to mess with their internals without the whole enable/disable, etc. ugliness we ran into? I somewhat doubt that we can find a generic "SuperIO" base class btw. Andreas -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
