Am 26.01.2012 08:50, schrieb Paolo Bonzini: > On 01/24/2012 06:19 PM, Thomas Higdon wrote: >> I agree that it's better to get this into a more general place. However, >> I wasn't willing to pull the MIN statement up into scsi_send_command >> because I don't understand the interplay between 'len' in that function >> and r->iov.iov_len. I couldn't see that there was a general relationship >> between these two variables that applied to both read/write commands and >> other commands. > > That's good enough, and it should fix also the bugs with GET > CONFIGURATION that Artyom reported. Two birds with a stone! > > Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> > > Kevin, shall I take this patch in the virtio-scsi series? I'll have to > resubmit anyway due to the QOM changes.
I have picked it up for the block branch. If it conflicts with your changes, you can just rebase on top of that. Kevin
