On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 14:23:55 +0100 Kevin Wolf <kw...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >> Also, I seem to remember that once we had discussed some kind of a "tray > >> status (open/closed) changed" event, which would be more generic. > > > > Yes, but my old series got complex and way beyond the original event. If we > > decide to cover all eject scenarios, I'd like to do it w/o adding new > > commands. > > I don't really remember. Were it problems with the design of a tray > status event or were you sidetracked by other problems? I was also trying to fix the 'change' command. So I added new commands to open, close and insert a medium in the tray. Then we had TRAY_OPEN & TRAY_CLOSE events... It was a 10 patch series iirc.
