This test is exceptionally heavyweight (nearly 330s) compared to the
two (both endians) TuxRun baseline tests which complete in under 160s.
The coverage is slightly reduced but a more directed test could make
up the difference.
tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py:TuxRunBaselineTest.test_ppc64:
Overall coverage rate:
lines......: 9.6% (44110 of 458817 lines)
functions..: 16.5% (6767 of 41054 functions)
branches...: 6.0% (13395 of 222634 branches)
tests/avocado/boot_linux.py:BootLinuxPPC64.test_pseries_tcg:
Overall coverage rate:
lines......: 11.6% (53408 of 458817 lines)
functions..: 18.7% (7691 of 41054 functions)
branches...: 7.9% (17692 of 224218 branches)
So lets skip for GITLAB_CI and save a few CI minutes.
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20230228190653.1602033-25-alex.ben...@linaro.org>
diff --git a/tests/avocado/boot_linux.py b/tests/avocado/boot_linux.py
index fe0bb180d9..be30dcbd58 100644
--- a/tests/avocado/boot_linux.py
+++ b/tests/avocado/boot_linux.py
@@ -84,6 +84,8 @@ def test_virt_kvm(self):
self.launch_and_wait(set_up_ssh_connection=False)
+# See the tux_baseline.py tests for almost the same coverage in a lot
+# less time.
class BootLinuxPPC64(LinuxTest):
"""
:avocado: tags=arch:ppc64
@@ -91,6 +93,7 @@ class BootLinuxPPC64(LinuxTest):
timeout = 360
+ @skipIf(os.getenv('GITLAB_CI'), 'Running on GitLab')
def test_pseries_tcg(self):
"""
:avocado: tags=machine:pseries
--
2.39.2
