On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 12:08:48PM +0800, Weiwei Li wrote: > henvcfg.PBMTE/STCE are read-only zero if menvcfg.PBMTE/STCE are zero. > > Signed-off-by: Weiwei Li <liwei...@iscas.ac.cn> > Signed-off-by: Junqiang Wang <wangjunqi...@iscas.ac.cn> > --- > target/riscv/csr.c | 13 +++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/target/riscv/csr.c b/target/riscv/csr.c > index feae23cab0..02cb2c2bb7 100644 > --- a/target/riscv/csr.c > +++ b/target/riscv/csr.c > @@ -1956,7 +1956,11 @@ static RISCVException read_henvcfg(CPURISCVState *env, > int csrno, > return ret; > } > > - *val = env->henvcfg; > + /* > + * henvcfg.pbmte is read_only 0 when menvcfg.pbmte = 0 > + * henvcfg.stce is read_only 0 when menvcfg.stce = 0 > + */ > + *val = env->henvcfg & (~(HENVCFG_PBMTE | HENVCFG_STCE) | env->menvcfg); > return RISCV_EXCP_NONE; > } > > @@ -1972,7 +1976,7 @@ static RISCVException write_henvcfg(CPURISCVState *env, > int csrno, > } > > if (riscv_cpu_mxl(env) == MXL_RV64) { > - mask |= HENVCFG_PBMTE | HENVCFG_STCE; > + mask |= env->menvcfg & (HENVCFG_PBMTE | HENVCFG_STCE);
nit: While HENVCFG_PBMTE == MENVCFG_PBMTE, I'd prefer we use MENVCFG_* with menvcfg and HENVCFG_* with henvcfg. > } > > env->henvcfg = (env->henvcfg & ~mask) | (val & mask); > @@ -1990,14 +1994,15 @@ static RISCVException read_henvcfgh(CPURISCVState > *env, int csrno, > return ret; > } > > - *val = env->henvcfg >> 32; > + *val = (env->henvcfg & (~(HENVCFG_PBMTE | HENVCFG_STCE) | > + env->menvcfg)) >> 32; > return RISCV_EXCP_NONE; > } > > static RISCVException write_henvcfgh(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, > target_ulong val) > { > - uint64_t mask = HENVCFG_PBMTE | HENVCFG_STCE; > + uint64_t mask = env->menvcfg & (HENVCFG_PBMTE | HENVCFG_STCE); > uint64_t valh = (uint64_t)val << 32; > RISCVException ret; > > -- > 2.25.1 > > Thanks, drew