On 01/23/2012 12:34 AM, Stefan Weil wrote: > Hi Rob, > > the patch was applied after v1.0, and there are two commits for > the stable-1.0 branch and the main development branch. > So I think that your git repository and your analysis is correct. > > Where did you get your v1.0 tarball from?
Sigh, I know what happened. I cd'd to the 1.0 tarball directory but used command history to re-run the test, and didn't edit the big $PATH=blah assignment at the start of the line, so that was still an absolute path pointing to the git directory. My bad, tested the wrong version. (I've had a lot of that tracking down this bug, the command line to make it work is very, very long.) Rob
