On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 02:03, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote:
> Am 21.01.2012 19:51, schrieb Blue Swirl:
>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 00:46, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote:
>>> Commit 793a137a41ad4125011c7022cf16a1baa40a5ab6 (target-sparc:
>>> Implement BMASK/BSHUFFLE.) introduced a stray usage of softfloat uint64
>>> type.
>>>
>>> Use uint64_t instead.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de>
>>> Cc: Richard Henderson <r...@twiddle.net>
>>> Cc: Blue Swirl <blauwir...@gmail.com>
>>
>> Good catch,
>> Reviewed-by: Blue Swirl <blauwir...@gmail.com>
>
> Feel free to apply this patch if Richard doesn't comment. The rest of
> the series needs some more review and benchmarking.
>
> Is there maybe a way to poison these types outside fpu/ meanwhile?

Maybe there could be, but wasn't one part of the problem that OSX uses
the same type names?

Reply via email to