On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 02:03, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote: > Am 21.01.2012 19:51, schrieb Blue Swirl: >> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 00:46, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote: >>> Commit 793a137a41ad4125011c7022cf16a1baa40a5ab6 (target-sparc: >>> Implement BMASK/BSHUFFLE.) introduced a stray usage of softfloat uint64 >>> type. >>> >>> Use uint64_t instead. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> >>> Cc: Richard Henderson <r...@twiddle.net> >>> Cc: Blue Swirl <blauwir...@gmail.com> >> >> Good catch, >> Reviewed-by: Blue Swirl <blauwir...@gmail.com> > > Feel free to apply this patch if Richard doesn't comment. The rest of > the series needs some more review and benchmarking. > > Is there maybe a way to poison these types outside fpu/ meanwhile?
Maybe there could be, but wasn't one part of the problem that OSX uses the same type names?