On 01/20/2012 07:48 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > On 01/20/2012 02:47 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 19 January 2012 23:17, Rob Herring <rob.herr...@calxeda.com> wrote: >>> On 01/19/2012 03:44 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: >>>> On 19 January 2012 21:31, Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsd...@calxeda.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> + highbank_binfo.board_id = 0xEC10100f; /* provided by deviceTree */ >>>> >>>> Where does this number come from? It's not in >>>> http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/machines/ >>>> >>>> Is 3027 (==0xbd3) you? >>>> http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/machines/list.php?id=3027 >>>> >>> >>> Much of the data there is wrong as none of it is used. 0 or -1 is the >>> right value as those are obviously meaningless. A highbank kernel will >>> never be booted without devicetree and in that case this number is >>> irrelevant. This is the legacy boot interface and qemu really needs to >>> learn to boot with a separate dtb. >> >> Yeah, but the documentation even for DTB boot says we should pass >> in a machine number. If 0 or -1 are right then there should be >> some documentation that says so. I'll accept "mailing list post >> from some authoritative person [eg Grant Likely]" if necessary. > > Kernel DT co-maintainer is not authoritative enough for you?
Peter, is that sufficient for me to send in the patch with a board_id of -1? Thanks. --Mark Langsdorf Calxeda, Inc.
