On 230205 1139, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > On 5/2/23 05:29, Alexander Bulekov wrote: > > > * Some device do not completely reset their state. This can lead to > > non-reproducible crashes. However, in my local tests, most crashes > > were reproducible. OSS-Fuzz shouldn't send us reports unless it can > > consistently reproduce a crash. > > These devices are buggy, hard/cold reset should be reproducible.
Agreed. However I don't think the fuzzer is tailored to report these types of bugs. OSS-Fuzz will just see that some crashes/inputs are not reproducible. I have been thinking about ways to make the fuzzer report incomplete VMStateDescriptions. Maybe something similar can be done for reboots. -Alex > > > * In theory, the corpus-format should not change, so the existing > > corpus-inputs on OSS-Fuzz will transfer to the new reset()-able > > fuzzers. >
