On 18 January 2012 18:04, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: > the following four files in hw/ are using rt_clock directly > > omap1.c > pxa2xx.c > strongarm.c > twl92230.c > > instead of rtc_clock. This means that they're not completely deterministic > when using -icount or in the future qtest. A simple search-and-replace > would be okay I think. However they could also use a notifier to update the > timers whenever the rtc_clock jumped backwards (see commit 17604da). If you > are going to add the notifier I'll happily leave the work to you; otherwise > I'll post the search-and-replace patch.
I have no strong interest in any of these platforms -- if the simple search-n-replace you propose works OK and has no particular disadvantages over the code as it stands that's fine with me. -- PMM