On 1/31/23 05:18, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 17/01/2023 09.07, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Test that invalid configurations do not cause a SIGSEGV, and cover a
valid configuration as well.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
---
  tests/qtest/libqtest.c        | 28 +++++++++++++++++-----
  tests/qtest/libqtest.h        | 12 ++++++++++
  tests/qtest/readconfig-test.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
  3 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/qtest/libqtest.c b/tests/qtest/libqtest.c
index 64ba98bc5853..53d766fe3fa5 100644
--- a/tests/qtest/libqtest.c
+++ b/tests/qtest/libqtest.c
@@ -402,6 +402,26 @@ static QTestState *G_GNUC_PRINTF(1, 0) qtest_spawn_qemu(const char *fmt, ...)
      return s;
  }
+QTestState *G_GNUC_PRINTF(1, 0) qtest_init_bare(const char *args)

I think you don't need the G_GNUC_PRINTF here, do you?

Indeed, it is incorrect.


r~


Reply via email to