Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> writes:
> On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 at 14:19, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 9/1/23 14:33, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
>> > On Mon, 9 Jan 2023, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> >> Use the same property name than the TYPE_PFLASH_CFI01 model.
>> >
>> > Nothing uses it? Can this break command lines and if so do we need
>> > deprecation or some compatibility function until everybody changed their
>> > usage?
>>
>> Good point... I missed that :/
>
> That should not be possible, because the cfi02 device
> is a sysbus device that must be mapped into memory. There's
> no useful way to use it on the QEMU commandline; the only
> users are those creating it from C code within QEMU.
I'd say beware of -global, but "fortunately" cfi.pflash01 cannot work
with it, since its '.' sabotages the -global's syntax.
Related prior discussion in the cover letter of "[PATCH RFC 0/1] QOM
type names and QAPI" and the replies to it:
Message-Id: <20210129081519.3848145-1-arm...@redhat.com>
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-01/msg07541.html
The patch there became commit e178113ff6 "hw: Replace anti-social QOM
type names".
[...]
