On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 05:51:47PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > On 27/12/22 08:20, Longpeng(Mike) wrote: > > From: Longpeng <longpe...@huawei.com> > > > > This allows the vhost-vdpa device to batch the setup of all its MRs of > > host notifiers. > > > > This significantly reduces the device starting time, e.g. the time spend > > on setup the host notifier MRs reduce from 423ms to 32ms for a VM with > > 64 vCPUs and 3 vhost-vDPA generic devices (vdpa_sim_blk, 64vq per device). > > > > Signed-off-by: Longpeng <longpe...@huawei.com> > > --- > > hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++------ > > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c > > index fd0c33b0e1..870265188a 100644 > > --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c > > +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c > > @@ -512,9 +512,18 @@ static void vhost_vdpa_host_notifiers_uninit(struct > > vhost_dev *dev, int n) > > { > > int i; > > + /* > > + * Pack all the changes to the memory regions in a single > > + * transaction to avoid a few updating of the address space > > + * topology. > > + */ > > + memory_region_transaction_begin(); > > + > > for (i = dev->vq_index; i < dev->vq_index + n; i++) { > > vhost_vdpa_host_notifier_uninit(dev, i); > > } > > + > > + memory_region_transaction_commit(); > > } > > Instead of optimizing one frontend, I wonder if we shouldn't expose > a 'bool memory_region_transaction_in_progress()' helper in memory.c, > and in virtio_queue_set_host_notifier_mr() backend, assert we are > within a transaction. That way we'd optimize all virtio frontends.
If we are doing something like this, I'd rather pass around a "transaction" structure so this can be checked statically. Looks like something that can be done on top though. -- MST