Am 11.01.2012 22:51, schrieb Alexander Graf: > > On 11.01.2012, at 22:49, Alexander Graf wrote: > >> >> On 11.01.2012, at 22:46, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> >>> On 01/11/2012 03:43 PM, Andreas Färber wrote: >>>> Am 05.01.2012 18:13, schrieb Andreas Färber: >>>>> Since 0c90c52fab5ea92d7f12b29bfe26a7cd75d9efcb (ppc_prep: convert to >>>>> memory >>>>> API) OHW was "Trying to execute code outside RAM or ROM at 0xfff00700". >>>>> >>>>> The BIOS MemoryRegion is created with a fixed size of 1 MiB. >>>>> Ensure that the full size can be accessed since the exception >>>>> vectors are located at 0xfff00000 and the BIOS may want to use them. >>>>> >>>>> It thereby no longer depends on the actual BIOS binary size. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber<afaer...@suse.de> >>>>> Cc: Avi Kivity<a...@redhat.com> >>>>> Cc: Alexander Graf<ag...@suse.de> >>>> >>>> Ping! Is everyone okay with this? Should I send a PULL? >>> >>> I would expect this to come through Alex's tree. >> >> I don't want to have yet another maintainer behind me. PREP and normal PPC >> stuff have very little common code, so I would rather have Andreas send PULL >> requests directly. > > Plus I know close to nothing about how PREP works ;). Code that does touch > common stuff should still either go through my tree or get acked by me of > course.
Please ack my MAINTAINERS update for prep_pci then. I would propose to do the equivalent with grackle and uni-north as part of my upcoming QOM updates, since today there's no obvious connection as far as get_maintainers.pl is concerned. Andreas -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
