On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 1:58 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Gregory Farnum
> <gregory.far...@dreamhost.com> wrote:
>> +static int qemu_rbd_snap_remove(BlockDriverState *bs,
>> + const char *snapshot_name)
>> +{
>> + BDRVRBDState *s = bs->opaque;
>> + int r;
>> +
>> + r = rbd_snap_remove(s->image, snapshot_name);
>> + if (r < 0) {
>> + error_report("failed to remove snap: %s", strerror(-r));
>> + return r;
>
> There's no need to report an error message here. This function should
> return -errno and let the caller decide how to show the error to the
> user. If you look at callers in the codebase they already print an
> equivalent error message.
>
> Stefan
Oh yep, guess I was a little too formulaic. Resend in a moment...
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:00 AM, Christoph Hellwig <h...@infradead.org> wrote:
>> +static int qemu_rbd_snap_remove(BlockDriverState *bs,
>> + const char *snapshot_name)
>> +{
>> + BDRVRBDState *s = bs->opaque;
>> + int r;
>> +
>> + r = rbd_snap_remove(s->image, snapshot_name);
>
>> + r = rbd_snap_rollback(s->image, snapshot_name);
>
> Have these functions been available since day 1 in librbd or should they
> get a version checks like the cache flush call?
Day 1. :)
