Am 10.01.2012 14:22, schrieb Anthony Liguori: > On 01/10/2012 06:58 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote: >> Probably we need to attack the reviewing problem first: That I review >> all block patches myself worked well as long as we were two or three >> people in that area, but today it doesn't scale any more without >> lowering the review standards - and I don't want to do that. Maybe we >> should introduce something like "One Reviewed-by buys you two >> Signed-off-bys for your own patches" ;-) > > I think one thing that helps is to make sure for maintainers to include > Reviewed-bys in commits. The script I use (below) takes a mbox with the full > thread and folks Reviewed-by/Tested-bys into the original patch spitting out > an > mbox with just the patches and tags. > > That way people are getting credit in git for doing reviews. It's a small > incentive but every little bit helps. > > http://git.codemonkey.ws/cgit/mbox-filter.git/
I usually do that, although manually. Of the 487 patches I have committed, 71 have a Reviewed-by tag in the commit message. Maybe I've missed to include it for some, but that's about the ratio that feels realistic to me. Kevin
