The PSW key mask is a 16 bit field, and the psw_key variable is
in the range from 0 to 15, so it does not make sense to use
"0x80 >> psw_key" for testing the bits here. We should use 0x8000
instead.
Message-Id: <20221205142043.95185-1-th...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <n...@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com>
---
target/s390x/tcg/mem_helper.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/target/s390x/tcg/mem_helper.c b/target/s390x/tcg/mem_helper.c
index 3758b9e688..006b6798a7 100644
--- a/target/s390x/tcg/mem_helper.c
+++ b/target/s390x/tcg/mem_helper.c
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ static inline bool psw_key_valid(CPUS390XState *env, uint8_t
psw_key)
if (env->psw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE) {
/* PSW key has range 0..15, it is valid if the bit is 1 in the PKM */
- return pkm & (0x80 >> psw_key);
+ return pkm & (0x8000 >> psw_key);
}
return true;
}
--
2.31.1
