On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 07:23:42PM +0100, Stefan Weil wrote: > The old code used sizeof(const struct cris_opcode **) where it should > have used sizeof(const struct cris_opcode *). As both sizes give the > same value, the resulting binary was ok, but static code analyzers > like coverity and clang complained. > > This is fixed here, and the code is also simplified by using g_new0. > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <s...@weilnetz.de>
Applied, thanks Stefan. Cheers
