On 10.01.2012, at 00:06, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 02:31:15PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: >> >> On 07.01.2012, at 21:16, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >> >>> Fix .rel.plt sections in the output to not only include .rel.plt >>> sections from the input but also the .rel.iplt sections and to define >>> the hidden symbols __rel_iplt_start and __rel_iplt_end around >>> .rel.iplt as otherwise we get undefined references to these when >>> linking statically to a multiarch enabled libc (using STT_GNU_IFUNC). >> >> Please see: >> >> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/130932/ >> >> I'd still say that we should fix the linker scripts regardless. Also for 1.0. > > I agree that we should either remove them or fix them. Not fixing them > because they should not be there, but at the same time not removing > them is a bad idea. > > On my side I have also tested that it can work with PROVIDE instead of > PROVIDE_HIDDEN, so we end-up with the same patches. Now how should we > proceed to merge that to master, which is the first step before getting > that into stable?
Either apply yours and rebase mine on top, so ppc64 is fixed too, or apply mine :). I'm rather indifferent on that one. Alex