On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 04:49:25PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 01:39:13PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com> writes:
> >>
> >> > On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 07:13:05AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> >> HMP "info spice" has a bit of code to show channel type
> >> >> SPICE_CHANNEL_WEBDAV as "webdav", disabled since commit 7c6044a94e
> >> >> "hmp: info spice: take out webdav" (v2.3.0), because it compiles only
> >> >> with Spice versions 0.12.7 and later. Our minimum version is 0.12.5.
> >> >
> >> > Last version bump was 4 years ago
> >> >
> >> > commit 1b63665c2c0e0d52735e0dd5217f109fe0dd2322
> >> > Author: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com>
> >> > Date: Wed Nov 28 19:59:32 2018 +0400
> >> >
> >> > configure: bump spice-server required version to 0.12.5
> >> >
> >> > ...snip....
> >> >
> >> > According to repology, all the distros that are build target
> >> > platforms
> >> > for QEMU include it:
> >> >
> >> > RHEL-7: 0.14.0
> >> > Debian (Stretch): 0.12.8
> >> > Debian (Jessie): 0.12.5
> >> > FreeBSD (ports): 0.14.0
> >> > OpenSUSE Leap 15: 0.14.0
> >> > Ubuntu (Xenial): 0.12.6
> >> >
> >> > We moved on from Debian and RHEL since then
> >> >
> >> > Debian 11: 0.14.3
> >> > RHEL-8: 0.14.2
> >> > FreeBSD (ports): 0.14.4
> >> > Fedora 35: 0.14.0
> >> > Ubuntu 20.04: 0.14.0
> >> > OpenSUSE Leap 15.3: 0.14.3
> >> >
> >> > IOW, we can bump to 0.14.0, and then revert the
> >> > webdav conditional commit.
> >>
> >> We need to bump spice-protocol, actually.
> >
> > Opps, I'm getting mixed up. The commit I mentioned was spice-server,
> > but the new versions I've listed just were indeed spice-protocol
> >
> >> Would you like me to bump spice-server as well? To which version?
> >
> > Yes, might as well, the spice-server versions are slightly different:
> >
> > Debian 11: 0.14.3
> > RHEL-8: 0.14.3
> > FreeBSD (ports): 0.15.0
> > Fedora 35: 0.15.0
> > Ubuntu 20.04: 0.14.2
> > OpenSUSE Leap 15.3: 0.14.3
> >
> > I think we might as well pick 0.14.0 for both protocol and server.
>
> Makes sense, but it leads to another question.
>
> I found obvious version checks for spice-protocol, and dropped the
> outmoded ones, namely
>
> #if CHECK_SPICE_PROTOCOL_VERSION(0, 14, 0)
>
> For spice-server, I see a bunch of SPICE_INTERFACE_FOO_{MAJOR,MINOR} we
> check, and which ones become outmoded is not obvious to me. Help?
Ignore all the interface ones. For the server, the check to look
for is against SPICE_SERVER_VERSION
chardev/spice.c:#if SPICE_SERVER_VERSION >= 0x000c06
chardev/spice.c:#if SPICE_SERVER_VERSION < 0x000e02
hw/display/qxl.c:#if SPICE_SERVER_VERSION >= 0x000c06 && SPICE_SERVER_VERSION <
0x000e02
hw/display/qxl.c:#if SPICE_SERVER_VERSION >= 0x000c06 /* release 0.12.6 */
hw/display/qxl.c:#if SPICE_SERVER_VERSION >= 0x000e02 /* release 0.14.2 */
hw/display/qxl.c:#if SPICE_SERVER_VERSION >= 0x000c06 /* release 0.12.6 */
hw/display/qxl.h:#if SPICE_SERVER_VERSION >= 0x000c06 /* release 0.12.6 */
include/ui/qemu-spice.h:#if !defined(SPICE_SERVER_VERSION) ||
(SPICE_SERVER_VERSION < 0xc06)
include/ui/qemu-spice.h:#if defined(SPICE_SERVER_VERSION) &&
(SPICE_SERVER_VERSION >= 0x000f00)
include/ui/spice-display.h:# if SPICE_SERVER_VERSION >= 0x000d01 /* release
0.13.1 */
ui/spice-display.c:#if SPICE_SERVER_VERSION >= 0x000e04 /* release 0.14.4 */
ui/spice-display.c:#if SPICE_SERVER_VERSION >= 0x000e02 /* release 0.14.2 */
A fair few of those will be obsolete
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
