Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@linaro.org> writes: > On 21/11/22 15:36, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On Mon, 21 Nov 2022 at 14:03, Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>> Tweak the semantic patch to drop redundant parenthesis around the >>> return expression. >>> >>> Coccinelle drops comments in hw/rdma/vmw/pvrdma_cmd.c; restored >>> manually. >>> >>> Coccinelle messes up vmdk_co_create(), not sure why. Transformed >>> manually. >>> >>> Line breaks in target/avr/cpu.h and hw/rdma/vmw/pvrdma_cmd.c tidied up >>> manually. >>> >>> Whitespace in fuse_reply_iov() tidied up manually. >>> >>> checkpatch.pl complains "return of an errno should typically be -ve" >>> two times for hw/9pfs/9p-synth.c. Preexisting, the patch merely makes >>> it visible to checkpatch.pl. >>> >>> checkpatch.pl complains "return is not a function, parentheses are not >>> required" three times for target/mips/tcg/dsp_helper.c. False >>> positives. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> >> >>> .../user/ase/msa/bit-count/test_msa_nloc_b.c | 9 +- >>> .../user/ase/msa/bit-count/test_msa_nloc_d.c | 9 +- >> [snip long list of other mips test files] >> >>> 328 files changed, 989 insertions(+), 2099 deletions(-) >> This patch seems to almost entirely be huge because of these >> mips test case files. Are they specific to QEMU or are they >> effectively a 3rd-party import that it doesn't make sense >> to make local changes to? > > They are imported and will unlikely be modified.
Not obvious to me from git-log. Should I drop the changes to tests/tcg/mips/?
