On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 8:03 PM Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 09:14:55AM +0800, Bin Meng wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > > > On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 12:41 AM Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 6:20 PM Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > From: Bin Meng <bin.m...@windriver.com> > > > > > > > > The maximum number of wait objects for win32 should be > > > > MAXIMUM_WAIT_OBJECTS, not MAXIMUM_WAIT_OBJECTS + 1. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.m...@windriver.com> > > > > --- > > > > > > > > Changes in v4: > > > > - make the out of bounds access protection explicit > > > > > > > > Changes in v3: > > > > - move the check of adding the same HANDLE twice to a separete patch > > > > > > > > Changes in v2: > > > > - fix the logic in qemu_add_wait_object() to avoid adding > > > > the same HANDLE twice > > > > > > > > util/main-loop.c | 10 +++++----- > > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > Ping? > > > > Would you queue this series? Thanks! > > The main loop is not my area as maintainer - it would normally be > Paolo IIRC. >
Thanks, but Paolo has been silent since day 1 ... Regards, Bin
